![]() Now how different is a bunch of text generation online? I think the human contributions will be vanishingly small in most communities. So the present is already a bunch of corporations owning bots and bots creating content for other bots. These bots are are working for corporations, which employ less and less humans. They make up the bulk of trading with real capital. You no longer ask your parents, teachers or libraries when you can just look it up online with no judgment.įinally, look at industries like Wall Street trading. They even stick them in nursing homes.Īlso, you no longer want to ask people for directions, you use Google Maps. Eventually, their own labor will be rendered obsolete, but for now they're in a race to the bottom to work harder and neglect their family even more. They often prefer this and find meaning in climbing the corporate ladder. Both fathers and mothers now neglect their own children and elderly parents so they can work for corporations. This already happened in other areas of life. many would start to prefer them to humans in their online communities, and give them even more social capital. The animatrix had a good sort of storyline on this, but it involved a lot of unrealistic violenceīut when bots do a lot of things better than humans, including comment, answer questions, make jokes, say romantic things, etc. But soon, bot-written articles will be out-shared by your own friends rather than that “hack liberal/establishment/hasbeen paper” Update: LinkedIn already has a huge problem of fake profiles applying for jobs and offering jobs. By the time the botswarms arrive online, it’ll be too late to do anything. It’s really not hard for a bot swarm to completely exploit society in these and many more ways, and we are not ready for it. ![]() A swarm could easily collude to downvote people or get them ostrasized by their own friend group, as we have already seen when it came to crypto, metoo, BLM, lockdowns, vaccines and now Ukraine. Relying on dang and others to root out bots will be futile. You’re going to be surrounded very shortly by sleeper bots, including on HN. So far all this has been with one player, amid others, no collusion. It isn’t obvious to me where on that informal ladder this tournament was.īut anyway, maybe the AI will follow the trajectory of chess AIs and quickly race away from human competition. It is sort of funny to think about - anyone who gets really legitimately good at anything competitive goes through multiple rounds of being the best in their social group, and then moving on from that group to a new one that is comprised of people who were the top-tier of that previous level. Winning a tournament might (?) mean you have to beat at least a couple players who understand the thing. Being in the top 10% of people who’ve played at least two games might leave a lot of bad players to beat up on. This bit seems a little more impressive I think. Participants could play a maximum of 6 games with their rank determined by the average of their best 3 games. > As part of the league, Cicero participated in an 8-game tournament involving 21 participants, 6 of whom played at least 5 games. > Cicero ranked in the top 10% of participants who played more than one game and 2 nd out of 19 participants in the league that played 5 or more games. > Cicero participated anonymously in 40 games of Diplomacy in a “blitz” league on What are the possible use cases? What are the benefits/downsides of them? Has Meta considered developing products based on this?" - Haydn Belfield, a Cambridge University researcher who focuses on the security implications of artificial intelligence (AI). What are possible prevention, detection & mitigation steps? "I'd like the researchers involved to say quite a bit more about "A.3 Manipulation" The human player said: "The bot is supposed to never lie I doubt this was the case here" "I was definitely caught more off guard as a result of this message I knew the bot doesn't lie, so I thought the stab wouldn't happen." " However, videos clearly show deception/manipulation" The paper centres 'human-AI cooperation' & the bot is not supposed to lie. "Having read the paper & supplementary materials, watched narrated game & spoken to one of the human players I'm pretty concerned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |